Supreme Court to consider whether domestic abusers can own guns

The U.S. Supreme Court will be hearing a case that could decide whether people who pose a credible threat of domestic violence can own guns.

Case Background: The focus of the case is Zackey Rahimi, a Texas man who violated a domestic violence restraining order by possessing firearms.
* Rahimi agreed to the order in 2020 after allegedly assaulting his ex-girlfriend.
* Despite the order, he was involved in five shootings between December 2020 and January 2021 and was found guilty of violating the Federal Firearms Act.

Legal Context: This case comes into light as an amendment to the Federal Firearms Act of 1994 prohibits those under active domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms.
* The case focuses on whether this amendment is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.
* It follows a recent Supreme Court decision stating that modern gun regulations must be in line with historical traditions of firearm regulation.

Court Developments: Lower courts have been interpreting this new ruling and its application.
* A recent ruling by a Mississippi district court found that permanently prohibiting someone from owning a gun due to a felony conviction was in violation of the Second Amendment.

What’s Next: The Supreme Court’s verdict on Rahimi’s case will provide further clarity on the interpretation and reach of the recent landmark decision.
* The court will hear oral arguments in the case this fall.

View original article on NPR

This summary was created by an AI system. The use of this summary is subject to our Terms of Service.

Contact us about this post

Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *