Trump-era special counsel defends his report on Russia probe against Democrats’ jabs

Trump-era special counsel John Durham defended his report on potential government wrongdoing during the Trump-Russia probe in a congressional hearing.

Background: In 2019, then-Attorney General William Barr appointed Durham to investigate the origins of the FBI investigation into the Trump campaign.
* The Durham report, released in May, referred to the FBI’s basis for starting the investigation as “seriously flawed.”
* The investigation did not refute special counsel Robert Mueller’s findings on Russian interference in the 2016 election.
* Durham’s investigation resulted in three prosecutions, with two acquittals and one conviction.

Defending his investigation: Durham rejected assertions that politics motivated his probe, stating he carried out the investigation “in good faith, with integrity, and without fear or favor.”
* Durham’s report criticized the FBI’s approach, but did not challenge the underlying findings of Mueller’s investigation.

Reactions to the report: Republicans, such as Ohio GOP Rep. Jim Jordan, view the report as evidence of political weaponization, while Democrats, like New York Rep. Jerry Nadler, see it as a waste of time and taxpayer dollars.
* Nadler criticized Durham for prolonging the investigation “to keep Donald Trump’s talking points in the news.”

View original article on NPR

This summary was created by an AI system. The use of this summary is subject to our Terms of Service.

Contact us about this post

Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *